next up previous index
Next: Criteria for Parameter Estimation Up: Theory of Parameter Estimation for Recognition Previous: Theory of Parameter Estimation for Recognition

7.2.1

Optimization-Based Object Recognition

In optimization-based recognition, the optimal solution is explicitly defined as the extreme of an objective function. Let f be a configuration representing a recognition solution. The cost of f is measured by a global objective function , also called the energy. The definition of E is dependent on f and a number of K+1 parameters . As the optimality criterion for model-based recognition, it also relates to other factors such as the observation, denoted , and model references, denoted . Given and , the energy maps a solution f to a real number by which the cost of the solution is evaluated. The optimal solution corresponds to the global energy minimum, expressed as:

 

In this regard, it is important to formulate the energy function so that the ``correct solution'' is embedded as the global minimum. The energy may also serve as a guide to the search for a minimal solution. In this aspect, it is desirable that the energy should differentiate the global minimum from other configurations as much as possible.

The energy function may be derived using one of the following probabilistic approaches: fully parametric, partially parametric and non-parametric. In the fully parametric approach, the energy function is derived from probability distributions in which all the involved parameters are known. Parameter estimation is a problem only in the partially parametric and the non-parametric cases.

In the partially parametric case, the forms of distributions are given but some involved parameters are unknown. An example is the Gaussian distribution with an unknown variance and another is the Gibbs distribution with unknown clique potential parameters. In this case, the problem of estimating parameters in the objective function is related to estimating parameters in the related probability distributions.

In the nonparametric approach, no assumptions are made about distributions and the form of the objective function is obtained based on experiences or pre-specified ``basis functions'' [Poggio and Edelman 1990]. This also applies to situations where the data set is too small to have statistical significance.

An important form for E in object recognition is the weighted sum of various terms, expressed as

 

where is a vector of potential functions. A potential function is dependent on f, and , where the dependence can be nonlinear in f, and often measures the violation of a certain constraint incurred by the solution f. This linear combination of (nonlinear) potential functions is not an unusual form. It has been used in many matching and recognition works; see [Duda and Hart 1973,Fischler and Elschlager 1973,Davis 1979,Gharaman et al. 1980,Jacobus et al. 1980,Shapiro and Haralick 1981,Oshima and Shirai 1983,Bhanu and Faugeras 1984,Wong and You 1985,Fan et al. 1989,Nasrabadi et al. 1990,Wells III 1991,Weng et al. 1992,Li 1994a]. Note that when takes the linear form, multiplying by a positive factor does not change the minimal configuration

 

Because of this equivalent, an additional constraint should be imposed on for the uniqueness. In this work, is confined to have a unit Euclidean length

 

Given an observation , a model reference and the form of , it is the value that completely specifies the energy function and thereby defines the minimal solution . It is desirable to learn the parameters from exemplars so that the minimization-based recognition is performed in a right way. The criteria for this purpose are established in the next subsection.



next up previous index
Next: Criteria for Parameter Up: Theory of Parameter Previous: Theory of Parameter