next up previous index
Next: Piecewise Constant Restoration Up: MRF Priors for Image Surfaces Previous: MRF Prior for Piecewise Constant Surfaces

MRF Prior for Piecewise Continuous Surfaces

 

In specifying prior clique potentials for continuous surfaces, only pair-site clique potentials are normally used for piecewise continuous surfaces. In the simplest case, that of flat surface, they can be defined by

 

where is a function penalizing the violation of smoothness caused by the difference . For the purpose of restoration, the function g is generally even, i.e.

 

and nondecreasing, i.e.

 

on . The derivative of g can be expressed as the following form

 

One may choose appropriate g functions to impose different smoothness assumptions: complete smoothness or piecewise smoothness.    

When the underlying does not contain discontinuities, i.e.

continuous everywhere, is usually a quadratic function  

 

Under the quadratic g, the penalty to the violation of smoothness is proportional to . The quadratic pair-site potential function is not suitable for prior surface models in which the underlying is only piecewise continuous. At discontinuities, tends to be very large and the quadratic function brings about a large smoothing force when the energy is being minimized, giving an oversmoothed result.

To encode piecewise smoothness, g has to satisfy a necessary conditiongif

 

where is a constant. The above means that g should saturate at its asymptotic upper-bound when to allow discontinuities. A possible choice is the truncated quadratic   used in the line process model   [Geman and Geman 1984 ; Marroquin 1985 ; Blake and Zisserman 1987] in which

 

The above satisfies condition (2.16). How to properly choose the g (or h) function discontinuity-adaptive restoration is the subject to be studied in Chapter 3.

A significant difference between (2.11) and (2.9) is due to the nature of label set . For piecewise constant restoration where labels are considered un-ordered, the difference between any two labels and is symbolic, e.g. in the set of . In the continuous case where labels are ordered by the relation, e.g. ``smaller than'', the difference takes a continuous quantitative value. We may define a ``softer'' version of (2.9) to provide a connection between continuous and discrete restoration. For piecewise constant restoration of a two-level image, for example, we may define

 

which in the limit is .

The above instances of prior models, the clique potential is a function of the first order difference which is an approximation of . They have a tendency of producing surfaces of constant or piecewise constant height, though in the continuous restoration, continuous variation in height is allowed. They are not very appropriate models for situations where the underlying surface is not flat or piecewise flat.

According to the discussions in Section 1.3.3, we may design potential function , and for surfaces of constant grey level (horizontally flat), constant gradient (planar but maybe slant) and constant curvature, respectively. It is demonstrated, e.g. in [Geman and Reynolds 1992], that potentials involving give better results for surfaces of constant gradient. Higher order models are also necessary for reconstruction from sparse data [Grimson 1981 ; Terzopoulos 1983a ; Poggio et al. 1985 ; Blake and Zisserman 1987].



next up previous index
Next: Piecewise Constant Restoration Up: MRF Priors for Image Surfaces Previous: MRF Prior for Piecewise Constant Surfaces